JUSH Second Semester

3rd Nine Weeks

Lecture Notes

 

 

OUR Lessons:

Day 1 Jan 5&6

Day 2 Jan 9&10

Day 3 Jan 11&12

Day 4 Jan 13&17

Day 5 Jan 18&19

Day 6 Jan 20&23

Day 7 Jan 24&25

Day 8 Jan 26&27

Day 9 Jan 30&31

Day 10 Feb 1&2

Day 11 Feb 3&6

Day 12 Feb 7&8 

Day 13 Feb 9&10

Day 14 Feb 13&14

Day 15 Feb 15&16

Day 16 Feb 17 & 21

Day 17 Feb 22&23

Day 18 Feb 24&27

Day 19 Feb 28&29

Day 20 Mar 1 & 2

Day 21 Mar 5&6

Day 22 Mar 7&8

Day 23 Mar 9&12

 

Go To:

JUSH Our Online Course Materials Cloud

History Channel:  This Day In History

Lecture Points:  Lecture points

American Pageant Lectures

American Pagaent 13th Edition Notes

Hanson History 121

 

My Civil War Unit—Civil War

Sherman’s Memoirs

 

 

E-Texts

Academic American Text

Digital History

Pageant Lectures

 

 

Day 1

JUSH

Jan 5, A1 & A3

Jan 6, B4 

 

Home

Texts

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Questions for today…

 

Why was it important that the French help America in the Revolutionary War?

 

Who was Benedict Arnold and what did he decide to do?

 

What did the Americans get out of the Treaty of Paris and how did France get cheated?

 

What was the decision on the slaves who had escaped during the fighting?

 

Opener:  Read in Schweikert  pgs. 83-87

do the following questions in groups…

 

1 Trust the French (pg. 83-84)

1.  What were the French waiting for before they would help the Americans?

2.  What did Louis XVI supply Americans with?

3.  What did the Americans need besides men and money from the French?

4.  Who was the best negotiator with the French?

5.  Why was he the best?

6.  Why did Spain help the Americans?

7.  What is diplomatic ineptitude and how did Britain suffer from it?

 

2 Southern Invasion, Northern Betrayal (pg. 84-86)

1.  Who were the Tories and where were most of them living?

2.  Who was Benedict Arnold?  Who was John Andre?

3.  What could have happened to Arnold if he had not participated in treason against George Washington?

4.  What were the Patriots trying to do to the British Army?

5.  Who was the “financier of the Revolution”?

6.  What did the Americans look like compared to the French?

7.  When did Cornwallis surrender?  What did his men do?  What song was played?

8.  Of 50,000 British troops who participated in the War, how many were lost?

9.  What was Washington’s greatest strength?

 

3 The Treaty of Paris, 1783 (pg. 86-87)

1.  Who negotiated the peace for the Americans?

2.  What did the Treaty of Paris 1783 do besides end the Revolutionary War?

3.  What did the French get out of the Treaty?

4.  What was the hardest point to deal with in America during the negotiations?

5.  What was to be done about escaped slaves?

 

 

 

1 ID’S John Paul Jones, Jean-Baptisete d’Estaing, Silas Deane, Arthur Lee, Louis Berthier, Marquis de LaFayette

2 ID’S John Andre, Henry Clinton, Peggy Shippen, Daniel Morgan, Nathaniel Green, Joseph de Grasse

3 ID’S John Adams, John Jay, Benjamin Franklin, Richard Oswald, French foreign minister Vergnnes

 

If time remains:

 

Lecture on factors that ended the Revolution

 

OR

 

Revolutionary War Powerpoint

 

 

Day 2

JUSH

Jan 9, A1 A3

Jan 10, B4

 

Home

Texts

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Go over answers from last period questions.  Answers

 

Do the Timeline on Pg. 88 in Schweikert to introduce Chapter 4 A Nation of Law, 1776-89

 

 

Day 3

JUSH

Jan 11, A1 A3

Jan 12, B4 

Home

Texts

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

Write the following timeline into your notes

3-3 Notes

A Nation of Law, 1776-1789

 

1776: Declaration of Independence; states adopt new constitutions

1777: Articles of Confederation (Congress adopts, but states do not finish ratifying until    1781); Articles of Confederation ratified; Congress establishes the Bank of North     America

1783: Treaty of Paris; Newburgh Conspiracy

1784: Ordinance of 1784

1785: Land Ordinance of 1785

1786: Jay-Gardoqui Treaty rejected; Virginia Religious Freedom Act; Shay’s Rebellion;     Indian Ordinance of 1786; Annapolis Convention

1787: Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia; Northwest Ordinance; the Federalist        Papers

1788; Constitution ratified by all states except Rhode Island and North Carolina

1789: New government formed; George Washington sworn in; United States of America   begins

 

Objectives Topic 9--The Confederation and the Constitution 1776-1790

 

 

Lecture notes:

 

The American Founding—Founding Period

 

Most people of intelligence focused their intellectual energy on government and constitution making…like the obsession with technology that we have today

 

Enlightenment Ideas

o       Using reason to figure things out rather than superstition.

o       People could figure out things for themselves...science.

o       People should be free to think for themselves

 

Renaissance

o       Rebirth--1300AD/1400AD

o       Before this time superstition/religion used to explain everything

 

Reason

 

America Free

From England, had a "Clean Slate" or as J. Adams said..."an

opportunity of beginning government anew from the foundation"

American Founding

 

Question

 

Do we need government?

Socrates 470BC to 399BC asks the same question  

 

War and Society Lecture 19

 

Day 4

JUSH

Jan 13, A1 A3 

Jan 17, B4  Jan. 16—Martin Luther King Day

Home

Texts

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Opener:  Schweikert questions…Set #18

 

Inventing America and Highways and Wolves, ppg. 88-92

 

 

ML King Day activities:

 

In 1950's America, the equality of man envisioned by the Declaration of Independence was far from a reality. People of color — blacks, Hispanics, Asians — were discriminated against in many ways, both overt and covert. The 1950's were a turbulent time in America, when racial barriers began to come down due to Supreme Court decisions, like Brown v. Board of Education; and due to an increase in the activism of blacks, fighting for equal rights.

Martin Luther King, Jr., a Baptist minister, was a driving force in the push for racial equality in the 1950's and the 1960's. In 1963, King and his staff focused on Birmingham, Alabama. They marched and protested non-violently, raising the ire of local officials who sicced water cannon and police dogs on the marchers, whose ranks included teenagers and children. The bad publicity and break-down of business forced the white leaders of Birmingham to concede to some anti-segregation demands.

Thrust into the national spotlight in Birmingham, where he was arrested and jailed, King helped organize a massive march on Washington, DC, on August 28, 1963. His partners in the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom included other religious leaders, labor leaders, and black organizers. The assembled masses marched down the Washington Mall from the Washington Monument to the Lincoln Memorial, heard songs from Bob Dylan and Joan Baez, and heard speeches by actor Charlton Heston, NAACP president Roy Wilkins, and future U.S. Representative from Georgia John Lewis.

King's appearance was the last of the event; the closing speech was carried live on major television networks. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, King evoked the name of Lincoln in his "I Have a Dream" speech, which is credited with mobilizing supporters of desegregation and prompted the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The next year, King was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

The following is the exact text of the spoken speech, transcribed from recordings.


 

 

ML King Dream Speech Text      Word Copy of Speech

 

Absent take following notes:

 

 

Back to Mr. Schweikert:

 

“Critical Period” 

 

How would the new country be organized and ruled?

 

We did not want our own King…some thought Washington would be a

good king…but no…we wanted something different.

 

Many people thought that the STATE Governments would do an adequate

job of governing us in the absence of the British.

 

This was natural as most folks at this time thought their STATE was their

Country.

 

Ben Franklin when representing America in France he ran into three guys

representing American States while waiting to meet with French Ambassador.

 

Founding how did we come up with this unique form of government where

we do not have anyone “in charge”…we do not trust anyone with governmental

power…the President of the United States is not able to do ANYTHING on

his/her own?

 

People at the time of the Founding had no use for far off governments…whether that government was in London, England or in New York, NY we do not trust government to control itself because they cannot!  (control them selves).

 

 

 

Day 5

JUSH

Jan 18, A1 A3

Jan 19, B4 

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Next:  Start of a new nation---Articles of Confederation

 

Revolution Lecture 20 Confederation

Open American Odyssey to page. 72…write three sentences about the main idea of that story about John Adams.

 

3-5 notes

          What’s the difference between a John Adams and a Jane Addams?

 

o       State Constitutions were being written prior to our even declaring independence from Great Britain.

o       Each colony should adopt a new government cutting out the stuff about Great Britain/England being in ultimate control

o       Drafting individual state constitutions provided practice for making the national constitution in 1787.

o       The idea that ordinary citizens could plan their own governments and draft written constitutions and vote their approval of self government was new and daunting

 

Constitution making to early Americans was the equivalent of winning the Super Bowl…to educated people and believe it or not, not so educated people…the idea of governing ourselves was very exciting…and S.C. doing this before we all agreed to declare independence (April/July 1776).

 

Excited to start with a clean slate.

 

Safety (free from injury, attack or murder) and happiness 

         

John Adams thought that each state should make a government that shall best result in ... "the happiness and safety of their constituents (citizen represented by government)...and America in general."

 

Happiness is going to be an important thing in the founding of America.

 

How to achieve happiness?  Lets use reason...have a government in each state...close to the people...local government is the best.  Massachusetts had the Town Selectmen.

 

What the founders wanted was representation and government by people we shop, work and eat with.

 

Americans become experts at creating government...Constitution Writing becomes a primary concern for early Americans...1st they write state constitutions...this leads them to write a national constitution.

 

We are responsible to come up with the best way to govern…should we have one big government…several small governments…what would be the best way to organize ourselves?

 

What kind of government is or would be the best?

 

Enlightenment—argument—King—we had experience with a King.

 

Why would a Hereditary Monarchy be or not be a good government?

          Any “monarch” is just a man/woman. 

 

If men were angels no government would be necessary!

 

Men are not angels so who should rule?

 

Make laws (Legislature)

Enforce laws (Executive)

Interpret laws (Judicial)

 

Who should do these things?  No one person or group.

 

We can’t trust one person or group to do these three things.

 

Power corrupts…absolute power corrupts absolutely.

 

Montesquieu, and enlightenment thinker who said…split up governmental power.

 

Are we going to have one big government...several small governments...what would be the best way to organize ourselves...because we have a "clean slate"...after Breaking from England we can start to establish our government from scratch.

 

All people could be capable of ruling...maybe people could rule themselves.

 

Problems with hereditary monarchy...maybe you get a jerk for a King or Queen...or maybe you have a wonderful, fair and honest King...and his son is an idiot...or maybe a King starts out as honest and fair and just but as he realizes his power he gets more and more greedy...power hungry and unfair...because he his just a person.

 

Never allow anyone to have absolute power!

 

Each branch would do its function--that would be its main job, but each branch would share the other branches' functions.

 

Give examples of benevolent rules and non-benevolent rulers.

 

Articles of Confedeartion-the Critical Period Vocab Chart (Nassivera)

 

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776)

 

In monarchies the crime of treason and rebellion may admit of being pardoned or lightly punished but the man who dares rebel against the laws of a republic ought to suffer death.

                                                                                                Samuel Adams (September 1786)

Are your people mad? 

George Washington to a friend in Massachusetts (October 1786)

 

“What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.”

Thomas Jefferson (November1787)

“Our new Constitution is now established, and has an appearance that promises permanency; but in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”

                                                                                    Benjamin Franklin (November 13, 1789)

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Absent copy above notes.

 

Day 6

JUSH

Jan 20, A1 A3

Jan 23, B4 

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Watch 1st 20 minutes of episode 1 Harvard Justice with Michael Sandel

 

Articles of Confederation Strengths and Weaknesses Power Point

 

10 Days that Unexpectedly Changed America:  Shay’s Rebellion  (:57 5:25)

 

Opener:

         

 

3-6 Notes

Articles of Confederation—Our “First Government” (After Declaring Independence)

          What did the Articles of Confederation do well?

o       It executed and won a War against England…many times there were problems…but in the end…we won our Independence

o       Brought the states together…like a treaty bringing separate countries together to work for common goals

o       Organized the Western lands…The problem was that some states had land claims all the way to the Pacific ocean…other states were “land locked”…the states with lots of land would of course be wealthier than the states who were locked in because they could sell their lands…The land ordinance said that new states would be created out of the new lands…these states would have the same standing as the “original” 13 states!

o       The states ceded their claims to the lands west of the Appalachians to the central government.

o       This helped forge a feeling of national unity and congress under the Articles enacted laws to organize the western territories and admit new states on an equal footing with the original states.

o       These 5 new states would not have slavery in them.  The Northwest Ordinance 1787 was an early law that limited slavery and formed 5 new states…compromise on slavery…slavery OK below the Ohio River…Slavery not OK above the Ohio River.

o       Run the post office…this is the service

o       It held the states together until the Constitution was written.

o       The Articles successfully negotiated a peace with Great Britain ending the Revolutionary War.

o       Congressional departments of Foreign Affairs, War, Marine, and Treasury were established, each under a secretary.

o       This set the precedent for the creation of the executive cabinets under the Constitution.

o       The Articles also encouraged cooperation among the states. Though not always successful, the Articles provided that each state give "full faith and credit" to the legal acts of the other states.

o       To declare war and make peace.

o       Limited ability to coin and borrow money…the stats could do this also

o       To detail with foreign countries and sign treaties

 

          What did the Articles of Confederation do poorly?

o       Get things done…needed all the states 13/13 to agree to change (make amendments to) the Articles of Confederation…7/13 a general law...9/13 to pass a tax or spend law!

o       Raise money…people had revolted against England because of taxes…there is no way to provide for the safety and happiness of the people without money!

o       Must pay debts…Revolution was paid for on borrowed money…borrowed from Americans and foreign countries.

o       How is American government going to pay this back without taxing?

o       Under the Articles the Confederation Congress could only ask for money from the states…states could refuse to contribute!

o       No money…no country!  Lots of people the government owed money to were Americans (soldiers and suppliers) these people wanted to be paid and when they were not they got upset.

o       The national government could not force the states to obey its laws.

o       It did not have the power to tax

o       It did not have the power to enforce laws

o       Congress lacked strong and steady leadership

o       There was no national army or navy

o       here was no system of national courts

o       Each state could issue its own paper money

o       Each state could put tariffs on trade between states. (A tariff is a tax on goods coming in from another state or country.)

 

         

The Articles of Confederation are our first government…after Declaring Independence!

 

 

 

 

Day 7

JUSH

Jan 24, A1 A3

Jan 25, B4 

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Opener:

American Odyssey; Read pgs. 73 to 75 do numbers 2 and 4 on page 76

 

Finish movie 10 Days that Unexpectedly Changed America:  Shay’s Rebellion (Left off at “A Civil War Looms”)

3-7 Notes

Shay’s Rebellion…

         

          What was it?

 

          Was Daniel Shay’s a good guy or a bad guy?  Why do you say this?

 

          What was he “Rebelling” about?

 

          Did he deserve the death penalty?

 

          What did he deserve?

 

 

 

 

Daniel Shays got upset---he was a veteran of the Revolution who fought for IOUS/worthless money. 

 

Shay’s Rebellion

o       Daniel Shays is a good guy—Rev War Veteran fought for American Independence

o       Was in the Army and got paid in script…IOUs

o       Govt. owes farmers money…it cant pay

o       Farmers owe banks money…they cant pay

o       Farmers will go to jail…nothing happens to the government

o       Articles of Confederation cant pay

o       Shays has no money!

o       Shays and the soldier/farmers decide to

              1. Close courts

              2. March on and burn Boston

o       This is anarchy…proof that Americans can not govern themselves

o       Worries Henry Knox (Boston dweller)

o       Send his worries to George Washington

o       Sam Adams sends an Army out of Boston… “Lincoln’s Army”

o       450 tons of stores in the Armory at Springfield, Mass. if the Shayites get this stuff they would not be stopped

o       Something had to be done to strengthen the Central Government

o       Leads to the Constitutional Convention

         

          The American Revolution by historical standards was not THAT revolutionary.

         

          The entire social structure did not change. 

 

          Revolution entails radical or total change. 

         

          France and Russia had revolutions—we had an “evolution”—slow change.

 

          During the “Revolutionary Period”—life went on as usual—people got          married, people went to work, people went to church and people played. 

 

          Life went on as usual and most “Americans” did not know a war was going on.

 

          Three countries born from our Revolution—America, Canada and Australia. 

         

          England started sending their criminals to Australia when they couldn’t send them    here.

 

          Self government—republicanism—was the most important outcome of the    revolutionary period.        

         

          The first thing we had to do after the DOI was make independent (of   

          England) governments—this was even more important than getting ready for war.

 

          This is America’s best skill—forming self governmental structures.

 

          How we get to be “America—The United States of America”.

 

George Washington’s reaction to Shay’s Rebellion:

http://shaysrebellion.stcc.edu/shaysapp/person.do?shortName=george_washington

 

Henry Knox Reaction to Shay’s Rebellion:

http://shaysrebellion.stcc.edu/shaysapp/person.do?shortName=henry_knox

 

More Shay’s Rebellion questions

 

1.  What did GW do after the Revolution—what did people think of this?

 

2.  How were debtors treated in America if they could not pay?

 

3.  What did Shays and his followers intend to do about it?

 

4.  How close did Shays and his followers come to succeeding?

 

5.  What came about as a result of the rebellion?

 

6.  What eventually happened to Daniel Shays?

 

Next: 1787 Constitutional Convention (A New Government is put into place)

 

Lincoln and the South


Charleston, South Carolina, 1865
(Image Source: Wikimedia Commons--public domain)

Question 0111142:

A practical expression of President. Lincoln's attitude of "with malice toward none, with charity toward all" can be viewed in

      (A)  his Ten Percent Plan which would have allowed easy re-entry of Southern states into the Union
      (B)  his choice of Andrew Johnson as a vice-president in 1864
      (C)  his appointment of generals like Grant and Sherman who were willing to enact heavy losses on the enemy during the Civil War
      (D)  the prosecution of Commander Wirtz of the Andersonville Prison in Georgia
      (E)  his removal of Gen. McClellan as commanding general

 

 

Day 8

JUSH

Jan 26, A1 A3

Jan 27, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Opener:

Evaluation on first three weeks

 

After completion do the Schweikert Questions set #19

 

Notebook for today

 

Letters of George Washington and Henry Knox concerning Shay’s Rebellion

 

Knox: http://shaysrebellion.stcc.edu/shaysapp/person.do?shortName=henry_knox

 

GW:  http://www.pbs.org/georgewashington/collection/pre-pres_1787feb25.html

 

a1

 

 

 

 

Day 9

JUSH

Jan. 30, A1 A3

Jan. 31, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

What do these have to do with the founding era?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Today’s Notes:

3-9 Notes

Source: The Confederation and the Constitution (9)

 

Shays’ Rebellion result:  1787 Constitutional Convention

(A New Government is put into place)

         

Shays was owed money by the govt. and he owed money to a bank. 

 

When he      asked the govt. for money they said “sorry” don’t have any to give you…when Shays gave the same response to the bank…he was threatened with jail and repossession…injustice!

 

Threat of Anarchy—no government, every person for themselves.

 

Can people rule themselves?

         

Constitution has been in place for 223 years…Inauguration Day March 1789 to January 2012.

 

          Meeting that came about as a result of the concern over Shay’s Rebellion

 

          Shay’s Rebellion—evidence that our ability to “rule ourselves” is lacking

 

1st attempt is the Annapolis (MD) convention…9 of 13 states say they will come, only 5 states come to the convention…not enough to matter.  Alexander Hamilton—he is a man that believes in STRONG government

 

Notes on the Federal ConventionMadison—debates at the Constitutional Convention

 

Federalist PapersMadison, Hamilton and John JayNew York articles “why the Constitution is awesome”

 

          Federalists were folks who were for the Constitution

 

          Anti-Federalists were folks who were against the Constitution

 

          Proof that men/women need kings or dictators to tell us what to do

 

          Shaysites (poor) marching on Springfield and Boston—going to burn down Boston

         

          Poor men going to burn down Bostonrich in Boston were going to use all their wealth to protect their lives and property from these “lawless and desperate” men.

A3

         

          This is the very definition of anarchy…through history this is what happened when men ruled themselves. 

         

          This is no way to live---Haiti

         

          Democracy—if people are only concerned with how much money they have poor will gang up on the rich and the rich will use what they have to protect their stuff.

         

          Important people who fought for our freedom do not want this to happen. Washington, Knox, etc.

         

          Reason this is happening:  Article of Confederation—inadequate for American self           government.

 

          Historically—when governments change (revolution)—there is bloodshed!

 

          In America:  We are peaceful!  It starts with the idea of the Articles of

          Confederation being replaced by the Constitution without a fight!

         

Thomas Jefferson:

 

“This example of changing the constitution by assembling wise men (people) of the state, instead of assembling armies, will be worth as much to the world as the former examples we have given it.”

 

          This is the guy that wrote “All Men Are Created Equal

 

 

·        Meeting in Philadelphia, PA, from May 15th (25th) 1787 to September 17th 1787

·        This ends up being the most important meeting in American History

·        The Constitutional Convention

·        Meeting where the “ideals” of the Declaration of Independence are matched with a government.

·        Declaration is the “Apple of Gold”…Constitution is the “Frame of Silver”

·        With the threat of anarchy posed by Shays Rebellion—Washington wrote letters

·        We should have a meeting at Annapolis, Maryland (1786) to fix this

o       How to pay our debts?  To Americans, to France, and other countries.

·        Few states sent delegates to this meeting (not enough to get anything done) (no quorum)

o       People were suspicious that the men who wanted change were going to go for a stronger central government

o       Also they were afraid that large states were going to try to get more power over small states

·        Alexander Hamilton…guy who said we better do something or our experiment in self government will fail.

·        12 states send delegates to PhiladelphiaRhode Island does not send

·        55 Men—rich, educated, leaders in their states, property holders, white, Protestant…does this demographic mean they are going to set up a system that is favorable to them?

·        Is this really a problem?  Charles Beard and Howard Zinn (historians) say yes!

·        Question comes—should we be a “gathering of states” (confederation) or a “nation”…federation…a republic? 

·        What is the vision of America—how can we best reach our goals (safety and happiness)?

·        Meeting in Philly starts in May of 1787—becomes the Constitutional Convention.

 

Day 10

JUSH

Feb. 1, A1 A3

Feb. 2, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

 

Notebook Matching Activity Confederation to Constitution

Match these with the words from last time!

 

 

 

Power point 9 A Good Start

3-10 Notes

“This example of changing the constitution by assembling wise men (people) of the state, instead of assembling armies, will be worth as much to the world as the former examples we have given it.”

 

          This is the guy that wrote “All Men Are Created Equal

·        Original goal fix the Articles of Confederation.

·        First order of business “Articles too broke to fix” Virginians (James Madison (MIP) and friends)…in a bar before the Convention starts…We need to start over!  This is illegal (coup).

·        55 men (assembly of demigods)/12 states (Rhode Island not there—ever)

·        Nationalists—Young—Washington and Franklin famous—Franklin called for abolition (getting rid of slavery) right then and there.

·        What was their motivation? What were they trying to do?

·        Factions (groups) develop—between who? Nationalists and “Statists”

·        Do we want a strong Government in Washington, D.C. or in Springfield, IL    

·        Who (what job best prepares one) should govern?  Lawyers?

 

 

Group that met in Philadelphia in summer of 1787 to “revise the Articles of Confederation” 

 

Most distinguished group of men in the history of America

          Washington, Hamilton, Franklin, Madison

 

What they accomplish in Philly is nothing short of a miracle…Miracle at Philadelphia

 

What happened in Philadelphia was essentially illegal

 

Americans…love government…very good at Constitution Writing

          Want things on paper

 

Mechanics of Compromise

o       No state always of the winning side and no state always on the losing side of the votes

o       Virginia Plan adopted…James Madison’s idea

o       He is the “author of the United States Constitution”

Three Compromises

 

The First problem:

How are states to be represented in the federal (central) government?

o       Virginia Plan vs. New Jersey Plan

o       Virginia (Big State Plan)—Madison, Washington, Edmund Randolph

o       New Jersey (Small State Plan)—William Patterson—no proportional representation!

o       Connecticut Compromise!

o       Alexis de Tocqueville—with recurring elections—they are not that big of a deal.

o       This encourages patience and not violence.

o       Always running for office.   Accountable to us!

o       Factions—groups of people with different ideas.  Nationalists/Statists.  Farmers/City merchants.  Addresses in Federalist Number 10.

o       Slaveholders/Free-soilers.  Big states (Virginia)/Small states (New Jersey).  Bill of Rights/No Bill of Rights.

 

 

o       Compromise—give something up to get something done…settling for a piece of success instead of total victory…this is the dangerous situation we face today.

 

The next problem; how to count slaves?

o       Not if there should be slaves—there was going to be slaves

o       Are blacks people/citizens or are they things/property?

o       If we are counting property for representation can’t northerners count their domesticated animals?

o       The dilemma of slavery is at the forefront of the American debate…1789-1860

o       Do northern states have to return escaped slaves?

o       Free blacks can’t get off ships in the south for fear that they would be re-enslaved.

 

Why are our founders so vague about slavery?

o       Free them in 1619—who does the work?

o       Free them in 1776—we lose the war

o       Free them in 1789—no country the Southern States leave the union then and not 1860

 

How to Choose the President?

o       Many thought the people too ignorant and disinterested to do it

o       Did not want to give the states too much power (State Legislatures)

o       Compromise is the National election by all citizens…tempered by the electoral college system…each state gets special electors the number depending upon the number of Representatives and Senators in Congress from a given state

 

The last and BIGGEST problem—what was going to “secure individual rights?”

o       Let the Constitution work like it was designed (Madison)…writing down these things cheapens them.

o       Write the rights down!  Most Anti-Feds said if this was done…they would support the Constitution

o       Every state government has a “Bill of Rights”…sometimes right at the beginning of the document

 

Patrick Henry Against the Constitution

          http://www.redhill.org/speeches/wethepeople.htm

Hamilton For the Constitution

          http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa15.htm

Ashbrook Center:  Constitutional Convention Site

 

 

Day 11

JUSH

Feb. 3, A1 A3

Feb. 6, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Opener—Study for quiz

 

Quiz on the Topic 9 matching   

After quiz:  Do American Odyssey worksheet Chapter 4 Section 1 Confederation to Constitution

 

Catch up with:  Power point 9 A Good Start

 

George Washington’s Rules of Civility

http://www.history.org/Almanack/life/manners/rules2.cfm

 

 

Day 12

JUSH

Feb. 7, A1 A3

Feb. 8, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

Finish/Go over Sheet Ch 4 Section 1

 

Hand out Ch 4 Section 2 Sheet—students do this sheet

 

Notes

1.   The World’s Ugly Duckling

1.   As a new nation, America struggled in its relations with other countries.

2.   Relations with England had several issues…

1.   There was no trade with England. The British would not repeal the Navigation Laws with their restrictions believing America would crawl back to trade on British terms anyway.

1.   The only British "trade" came via American smugglers who were up to their old ways.

2.   The British were up to trickery along the American frontier.

1.   The British connived with disgruntled Ethan Allen and brothers to possibly get Vermont back to England.

2.   Though they were supposed to leave, the British retained several trade posts along the American frontier. They said this was to reclaim losses to Loyalists, but…

3.   More likely, the posts were to be bases to stir up Indian discontent against the Americans.

3.   There were issues with Spain

1.   The Spanish closed off the mouth of the Mississippi River. This was a serious threat to the trans-Appalachian states which needed the river to export goods.

2.   The Spanish laid claim to parts of Florida (today's Mississippi and Alabama).

3.   The Spanish also stirred up the Indians against the Americans.

4.   There were issues with France

1.   The French were not as friendly now that England had been humbled. The French wanted their debts paid by America.

5.   There were issues in North Africa

1.   North African pirates, notably the Dey of Algiers, robbed American ships. The British had paid tribute (or "bully money") and America had enjoyed that coverage. On her own, America was too weak to fight and too poor to pay. This was an embarrassment.

2.   A Convention of “Demigods”

1.   A meeting was called in Annapolis, Maryland to strengthen the Articles.

1.   They wished to mainly address the issues of money, especially commerce.

2.   9 states were invited but only 5 states arrived which was not a quorum (enough to hold a meeting). They did agree to meet again.

2.   The next meeting became known as the "Constitutional Convention" when the U.S. Constitution was written.

1.   55 delegates met in Philadelphia in May of 1787. 12 of the 13 states were represented (Rhode Island wanted no part of it).

2.   Their goal as laid out by Congress was "the sole and express purpose of revising" the Articles, not to pitch it out and start over (which is what they wound up doing).

3.   Attendance (and non-attendance) at the meeting was of such high quality Jefferson called the delegates "demigods." They could be divided into three categories…

1.   Demigods—George Washington (chairman), Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison.

2.   Revolutionaries overseas and absent from the meeting—Thomas Jefferson (in France on business), John Adams (in England on business), Thomas Paine (in Europe as well).

3.   Patriots who were absent—John Hancock, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry. These men, especially Adams and Henry, were independent-minded and didn't like the idea of strengthening the government. Their specialty was tearing down governments, not building them up.

3.   Patriots in Philadelphia

1.   The men attending the Constitutional Convention were generally young, aristocratic, and well-educated.

2.   These delegates recognized issues were at hand: the inability to maintain order, "runaway democracy" in various states, and pressure/threats from foreign nations.

3.   Essentially, the problem was that the states had too much freedom or independence; the solution was to strengthen the federal government.

4.   Hammering Out a Bundle of Compromises

1.   Despite their plans for revision only, the Convention delegates tossed out the Articles and began writing an entirely new Constitution.

2.   The most heated conflict was over the question, "How will representation in Congress be decided?"

1.   The "Virginia Plan" (AKA "Large States Plan") proposed that representation would be based on a state's population. They reasoned that the more people a state has, the more representatives they should have in Congress.

2.   The "New Jersey Plan" (AKA "Small States Plan") objected to Virginia saying that if Congress went solely by population, then the small states' votes wouldn't matter since they'd simply be always out-voted. They reasoned that states are equal to one another, regardless of the quantity of people living in them, and therefore states should have an equal vote in Congress.

3.   After much debate and a standstill, the "Great Compromise" was offered. It said that…

1.   Congress would be bicameral (have 2 houses).

2.   The House of Representatives would be based on state population, following the Virginia Plan.

1.   Bills pertaining to taxation would begin in the House.

3.   The Senate would have 2 senators from each state making them equal, following the New Jersey Plan.

1.   The Senate would approve/reject presidential treaties and appointments.

4.   They agreed to have an executive branch (a president). The president would be commander-in-chief of the military, could veto legislation. But, the president (and the other branches) would be held in check through a system of checks-and-balances on power.

5.   The president would be elected by an Electoral College (a group of official presidential voters) rather than by the people. The people were viewed as being too ignorant to elect a president. To be fair, at that time people were less educated and news traveled slowly and without reliability so a voter likely might be ill-informed.

6.   The Three-Fifths Compromise answered the question, "How will slaves be counted when determining a state's population?"

1.   Southern states wanted slaves counted (to gain more votes in Congress) and Northern states did not want to count slaves (to retain more votes in Congress). The compromise agreed to count 3/5 of the slaves as part of the state's population.

7.   The delegates agreed to allow states to halt slave importation after 1807. This measure showed signs of the early anti-slavery movement. But, it was something of a hollow measure—by this time, slavery had become self-sufficient and slave importation wasn't really needed anyway.

5.   Safeguards for Conservatism

1.   The delegates all agreed that a system of checks-and-balances was needed to prevent any one branch from hording too much power. Conservatives also wanted safeguards from the "mobocracy" or mob rule. They put into place such things as…

1.   Federal chief justices were appointed for life, thus creating stability that conservatives liked.

2.   The electoral college created a buffer between the people and the presidency.

3.   Senators were elected by state legislators who were supposedly educated, not by the common people.

4.   Thus, after the American Revolution, the voters actually only voted for 1/2 of 1/3 of the government (only for representatives in the House).

2.   Still, at the base level, power wrested with the people.

3.   By the end of the Constitutional Convention in September of 1887, 42 of the 55 delegates signed it. The others had left in protest or would not sign it.

6.   The Clash of Federalists and Anti-federalists

1.   Once written, the Founding Fathers faced an even tougher task—to get the Constitution ratified by the states. They knew that some states would reject it. They knew that most state legislatures would reject it. So…

1.   The Constitution was sent out to the state conventions where it would be evaluated and voted upon.

2.   At first, there was surprise because a brand new constitution had been written. The people expected a fixed up Articles of Confederation; that was the purpose of the meeting (the convention had been held in strict secrecy).

2.   Two camps emerged in the ratification debate, Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

1.   The Federalists wanted the Constitution ratified.

1.   They wanted a stronger central government to establish and maintain order.

2.   They generally came from the more well-to-do classes, were often former Loyalists, were often property owners, typically lived in the older or coastal areas, and were often Episcopalians.

2.   The Anti-Federalists did not want the Constitution ratified.

1.   They believed it gave too much power to the national government. After all, wasn't that what the American Revolution had been fought over?

2.   They were generally from the less-educated classes, were usually farmers, were believers in states' rights, and normally lived in the frontier areas. They were often Baptists or Methodists.

3.   At their root, the Anti-Federalists felt that the Constitution had been written by and for the aristocratic folks and that it threatened people's independence and freedoms.

1.   Their complaints along these lines were (a) a lack of a bill of rights, (b) the riddance of annual elections, and (c) the formation of a standing army. All of these things could be used against the people.

7.   The Great Debate in the States

1.   The conventions in each state needed delegates. Elections were held.

2.   Four states ratified the Constitution quickly.

3.   Massachusetts voted for the Constitution, but it was a tough race and a close vote. Folks like Sam Adams campaigned against the Constitution thinking it gave too much power to the federal government.

1.   Massachusetts ratified it with the promise that a Bill of Rights would immediately be written and adopted.

2.   Massachusetts was a critical state, kind of a "tipping point." Had the Constitution failed here, it likely would not have been ratified by the other states.

4.   After three more states ratified it, it became active in June of 1788.

5.   The final hold-outs were Virginia, New York, North Carolina, and Rhode Island.

8.   The Four Laggard States

1.   Four states had reservations about adopting the Constitution and held out. But they eventually did ratify it mainly because after 9 states adopted it the Constitution took affect. What would the 4 laggards do, become their own countries? It wasn't practical.

2.   Virginia ratified it in a close vote because New Hampshire was about to adopt the Constitution as state number 9—the number needed to activate it.

3.   New York decided to go with the Constitution due to (a) The Federalist Papers of John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton and (b) the realization that a future on their own was pointless.

4.   Finally, North Carolina and somewhat disgruntled Rhode Island ratified the Constitution and made it unanimous. They were given considerable pressure to do so and also realized to go-it-alone was not productive.

9.   A Conservative Triumph

1.   Like winning the American Revolution where a few patriots had pulled off independence, ratifying the Constitution was a minority victory. This time, the minority was the conservatives.

1.   The patriots were a much more liberal, perhaps radical group. It was now time for the conservatives to pull the pendulum back toward the center.

2.   To ratify the Constitution, an estimated 1/4 of the adult white male population had voted for convention delegates. Most of those voters were landowners.

3.   The conservatives obtained certain measures that eased their minds…

1.   First, a stronger government that could deal with the "mobocracy" such as Shays' Rebellion.

2.   Secondly, the elite or aristocracy had built in certain safeguards to their rule such as the electoral college, permanence of judges, and indirect elections of senators. All of these things meant stability—the number 1 thing on their mind.

 

Three Big Compromises—before convention broke up:

          How many Representatives per State?

          Should we even keep slavery around?  How should Slaves be counted?

          Should we have an executive (President…what would that look like?)

Over arching concern was how much power to give to the Central government

Iron these things out in 3 months…39 of 55 sign the Constitution

 

o       First major political contest over whether or not the Constitution should be adopted.

o       When 9/13 states approve this Constitution it becomes the law of the land

o       Totally illegal!

o       Articles said 13/13 needed to change the Articles

o       That is the first complaint made by the Anti-Federalists…folks against the Constitution.

o       Central government is getting too much power…and the state governments are losing power.

o       No Bill of Rights!

o       Federalists…folks for the Constitution argued that a strong, energetic government was needed in order to secure individual rights and freedom

 

o       How can strong government secure rights and freedom? 

o       Strong government is meant to control people…

o       Americans do not want to be controlled! 

o       By a king or anyone else.

 

o       Founders set up a system of Checks and Balances and Separation of Powers

o       Government should:  Pay bills/protect people

 

It is easy to tear down a government…not hard to have a revolution…the difficulty comes when you win in your revolution and now the winners have to govern.

 

o       George Washington was for the constitution

o       It was assumed that Washington would be the nation’s first President

 

The main complaint made by the Anti  Federalists is that the Constitution contained no Bill of Rights…every state Constitution started with a Bill of Rights

 

 

 

Day 13

JUSH

Feb. 8, A1 A3

Feb. 9, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Opener:  Use any book to find the answer and explanation for this question:

Ratifying the Constitution

 

Power point #10 on the New Nation/Constitutional Convention

 

Watch and take notes until slide 21

 

George Washington Movie  Forging a Nation—Questions

 

Why does Patrick Henry not like the new Constitution?

 

Who are Washington’s closest advisors?

 

How do they act towards each other?

 

What is speculation?  Why are speculators good?…why are they bad?

 

Why does Washington get mad when he goes to Congress to get “advise and consent” for a treaty?  What does he say about going back?

 

How does Madison think the debts of the US should be paid?

 

What is assumption and why is it good for some states and bad for others?

 

 

More notes:

Tyrant—absolute ruler(s) unrestrained by law or constitution.

 

Main goal of our Constitution is to prevent tyranny.

 

King George III—tyrant

 

Easiest to become a tyrant when you are a King…Absolutism

 

Absolutism/tyranny is no good

 

Constitutional Convention set up a system where no one could get absolute power.

 

Checks and Balances and Separation of Powers

 

Ultimately in our Constitutional system—the people are in charge.

 

What if the people become tyrants?

          Majority rules is the rule

          What if the majority becomes tyrannical?

          Tried to create a system that prevents or makes it very difficult for tyranny to exist and survive

 

It had never been tried before…no one knew how it would work.

 

          What is a President?

          How do you deal with other countries?

                   Should the President have advisors?

          How do the three different branches of government work with each other?

 

Rules or decisions that become guides for future rules or decisions—precedent

 

George Washington—said “so help me God” at end of oath of office

 

Federalists (people who wanted the Constitution ratified) become the first political party.

          George Washington—wanted the Constitution

                                                     It was assumed he would be the first President

                                                     People trusted that he would not be a tyrant

 

Presidency had the potential to be more powerful than a King!

                   Why?  He had the affirmation of the entire country behind him.

                   Philip Freneu-1st critic of a President in journalism…test of free press

                             The government has no right to control what is written or said                                 about the President or any government official.

 

 

 

Mind Map of Federalism & First Party System

 

 

Day 14

JUSH

Feb. 13, A1 A3

Feb. 14, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Opener:

 

Read about the Constitutional Convention in Schweikert,  pages 110-116. 

 

1.  What was the sole and express purpose of the meeting in Philadelphia?

2.  Which state did not send delegates?

3.  How many people (men) attended the convention?

4.  Nearly all men were _______________________.

5.  Why didn’t Patrick Henry attend?

6.  What was their average age?

7.  Which two men had the “highest reputation?”

8.  What class were they from?

9.  What did Charles Beard and Howard Zinn think of the founders?

10.  What did Paul Johnson think of the founders?

11.  What was the final source of contention at the convention?

12.  What occupation did Madison think should rule…..Hamilton?

13.  Define interest as defined by Madison, Hamilton and Washington.

14.  What eventually was going to be the occupation of the government officials?

15.  What was the Virginia Plan…how about New Jersey?

16.  What was the “Connecticut Compromise?”

17.  What did De Tocqueville think of “long interval elections”?

18.  What was the founder’s solution to this? 

19.  Which states could block any law dealing with slavery?

20.  What did the Northwest Ordinance say about slavery? 

21.  James Wilson’s compromise measure concerning slaves consisted of….

22.  Did the Southern states gain an advantage because of this plan?

23.  What three years gave the people in America a chance to end slavery?

24.  Name three examples where slavery was tinkered with in the colonies.

25.  What were Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton, Franklin and Washington’s views on slavery?

26.  What was Gouverneur Morris’ argument against the 3/5’s plan?

27.  What threat was slavery to “comity”?  What is comity?

28.  What would have happened in 1776-1789 if the slavery issue was pushed?  (According to Schweikert)

29.  What three things were the framers highly focused on?

30.  What did Franklin call our government when asked by a female citizen what      it was?

 

 

Day 15

JUSH

Feb. 15, A1 (Keytrain) A3

Feb. 16, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Answer the Questions above…together

 

Watch John Adams Episode 5Unite or Die—John Adams as George Washington’s Vice President—what to call George and visit to Senate for Advise and Consent

 

Launching the New Ship of State

 

10 Launching the New Ship of State Workbook

 

Day 16

JUSH

Feb. 17, A1 A3

Feb. 21, B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Objectives:  Launching the New Ship of State

 

 

Declaration=Apple of Gold

 

Constitution=Frame of Silver

 

Abe Lincoln

 

Power point 11 Washington

Absentees should watch PowerPoint on George Washington and take 2 pgs of notes.

Documents:

Declaration of Independence

Constitution of the United States of America

Federalist10

Letter of Transmittal

Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America

Index to the Constitution and Amendments

Letter to Henry Lee from Thomas Jefferson, May 8, 1825

Letter to Roger Weightman from Thomas Jefferson, June 24, 1826

Gettysburg Address, Abraham Lincoln, November 19, 1863

Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln, March 4, 1865

Fragment on the Constitution and Union, Abraham Lincoln, c. January, 1861

Suggested Readings and Other Letters, Speeches

 

My Class Notes: Launching the New Ship of State

 

 

Chapter about the start of America (under the Constitution) and how America is going to be.

 

Washington envisioned…everyone getting along…all would work for the “good of the country” like he did.

 

·        Plea—asks for—no political strife—no permanent political parties

·        Washington and Madison (who called political parties factions) created them

·        Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson—their disagreements over domestic (home) and foreign (international) issues forced the formation of the first political parties

·        Madison also joined in to promote differences that would define the political parties

·        He wanted divisions to balance political power

·        If we are interested in different things…if we stand for or find different issues important we can come to government to find compromise and work through our differences without violence and/or an authoritative figure telling us what to do

 

In his Farewell Address Washington:

  • Extols the benefits of the federal government. "The unity of government...is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence...of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize."
  • Warns against the party system. "It serves to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration....agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one....against another....it opens the door to foreign influence and corruption...thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another."
  • Stresses the importance of religion and morality. "Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice?"
  • On stable public credit. "...cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible...avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt....it is essential that you...bear in mind, that towards the payments of debts there must be Revenue, that to have Revenue there must be taxes; that no taxes can be devised, which are not...inconvenient and unpleasant..."
  • Warns against permanent foreign alliances. "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world..."

On an over-powerful military establishment. "...avoid the necessity of those overgrown military establishments, which, under any form of government, are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to Republican Liberty."

 

Day 17

JUSH

Feb. 22 A1 A3

Feb. 23 B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

Opener:

         

Schweikert Pgs. 127-134 Create Questions (One Per Paragraph)

 

10 - Launching the New Ship of State

Smart Notes


 

Day 18

JUSH

Feb 24 A1, A3

Feb 27 B4

Home

Texts

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Finish 10 - Launching the New Ship of State

 

Opener/Review: 

 

Do Territorial Expansion Worksheet 5.1, pg. 130 of American Odyssey

 

Challenges in Early America

          How should our government work?

                   Washington and Adams answer this question

                   Peaceful transfer of power when we have a new President

                   President is going to have advisors (Cabinet)

                   Read the Constitution and figure out how it is going to work

                   Precedents--actions that become guides for future actions

          Dealing with other countries

                   What should we do with/to other countries?

                             England, France and Spain

                             Indians...Natives

                             Foreign affairs---mind your own business!  GW and JA

                   People messing with US

                             Biggest threat was in New Orleans

          Thomas Jefferson--very different man

                   Every man/woman should have access to education

                   New Orleans should always be open to our ships!

 

 

·        Fear of French Revolution—violence, beheadings…destruction of state controls and religious structures

·        When Jefferson is inaugurated in 1801…people wonder if that would happen here…will it turn violent?

·        It does not…we have peaceful transfer of power.

·        In America it is not “revolutionary” when Adams loses to Jefferson or when McCain loses to Obama.  Things do not get violent.

·        When Jefferson became president…he calmed all fears…he was a “Founding Father”…he wrote the Declaration…and he said in his inaugural address (first speech as president), “we are all Republicans, we are all Federalists.”

·        He assured people that American principles and institutions would be the backbone of our government.

·        Fight over the direction of our country was then between President Thomas Jefferson and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall.

·        What does the Constitution mean…what does it not mean.  Interpretation and implementation of the Constitution.

·        Federalists like Marshall had their ideas and Republicans like Jefferson had their ideas about the Constitution.  Could not look at the notes of the Convention…Madison did not release them until his death.

·        Jefferson was a “strict constructionist” before he was President…that meant he thought the government could do no more than what the Constitution said it could do…if the Constitution did not say it…the government could not do it.

 

 

·        We need the New Orleans, Louisiana port open to our goods…all products west of the Appalachian Mountains goes down the Ohio R. and the Mississippi R. and around Florida…then up the coast to Eastern Markets.


 

 

·        Problem arises when France (Napoleon) offers us all of the “Louisiana Purchase”…Jefferson sent a guy named Livingston to France to buy New Orleans for no more than $10 million.  When he (Livingston) got to France, Napoleon said, “how much for the whole?”


Napoleon (Dynamite) Bonaparte

 

·        Constitution does not say the president can double the size of the country.

·        Napoleon decided to sell Louisiana to America:

o       Because of a slave revolt in Haiti led by the beautiful Touissaint L’Ouverture…a hauntingly beautiful man

o       Because he was giving up on an “American Empire”

o       Because he (Napoleon) slipped in the tub and splashed his brother who thought it a mistake that he was going to sell Louisiana to the Americans.

·        Ends up being the biggest land deal in the history of America…more than doubles the size of the United States…4 cents an acre…but we did not know what we had purchased (530 million acres of land) for $28 million …no idea.

·        Mystery of what was out there was going to solved by Lewis and ClarkJefferson hired them to go on an expedition “to the westward” before the Senate even ratified the sale.

·        They are the first “astronauts”…they are going to run into the folks that are going to be the next American challenge…Indians…natives…the folks who have been on these lands for thousands of years. 

·        Jefferson’s challenge how to respect the Indians lands…protect Indian interests…while at the same time supporting white settlement to the west. 

·        Remember he believed the farmers were God’s chosen people. 

·        If he could fill the Louisiana Purchase land with new farmers his vision of America could be realized…what about the Indians? 

·        We know the Indians eventually get cheated out of their lands and we now live on their lands. 

·        One of the saddest chapters in American history.

 


 

George Washington’s First Inaugural Address

 

George Washington’s Farewell Address

 

 

 

 

 

 

Worksheets: (11) The Triumphs and Travails of Jeffersonian Democracy

Here are some links to Jefferson's words,

A collection of Jefferson Quotations at the University of Virginia

Selected Works of Thomas Jefferson at the Constitution Organization.

 

 

Day 19

JUSH

Feb 28 A1 A3

Feb 29 B4 Keytrain

Home

Texts

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

 

 

Importance of folks like the Mormons (If absent take 1 ½ pages of notes on this site)

 

 

 

Louisiana Purchase—doubled the size of the United States—nobody (white) knew what we had purchased.

 

Jefferson commissions:  The Voyage of Discovery--$2,500

 

Meriwether Lewis and William Clark

·        Start at St. Louis, Missouri, May 14, 1804-get back on September 23, 1806 (2 years, 4 months, 9 days)

·        Thomas Jefferson—spend the money to buy Louisiana—spend the money to explore it…is this Constitutional

·        Jefferson fought his whole political career to limit the power of government…now he doubles the size of the country with one decision.

·        Strict Construction Vs. Loose Construction

·        Inaugural address—Americans, “possessing a chosen country, with room enough for our descendants to the thousandth and thousandth generation.”  Very much an exaggeration.

·        Jefferson was commenting on the vastness of the land

·        People at this time thought it would take “generations” to settle the land out to the Mississippi River

·        Some folks had a vision of the United States expanding out to the Pacific Ocean

·        This idea of a coast to coast America…along with the knowledge that we had to control the west instead of France—made Jefferson’s Louisiana Purchase a necessity

·        Jefferson decided to explore Louisiana Territory before the Senate officially OK’d the purchase

·        He was curious—he wanted to know who or what was out there

·        He also wanted to know what he bought

·        Choose Meriwether Lewis—Army Captain, lots of frontier experience, interested in nature, MI

·        William Clark—former lieutenant in the Army, fascinated by nature, recommissioned in the Army

·        They form the “Corps of Discovery”…mission

o       Tell the Natives (Indians) what to expect

o       Establish friendly relations with them

o       Record the Indians’ language and habits

o       Make topographical studies

o       Record new plants and animals

o       Try to find a good (water) way through the continent to the Pacific Ocean

·        40 to 50 men

·        Travel up the Missouri River…into Mandan Indian territory into what is now North Dakota

·        Winter there…continue to the Pacific Coast in the spring

·        We have lots of knowledge about this adventure because these guys journaled everything

 

 

 

The Triumphs and Travails of the Jeffersonian Republic--1800-1812

 

Federalist and Republican mudslingers (try to ruin the reputation of a person…famous or otherwise)

Thomas Jefferson became the victim of one of America's first "whispering campaigns" rumors…innuendo—people assume things about the famous person… 

The Federalists accused him of having an affair with one of his slaves—Sally Hemmings.

 

Sally Hemmings (Artist’s Rendition)

 

The Jeffersonian "Revolution of 1800"

Thomas Jefferson beat John Adams (incumbent—sitting office holder) to win the election of 1800 by a majority of 73 to 65 electoral votes.

 

Watch Burn’s Lewis and Clark-to arrival at the Mandan Village 32:24:  Movie Questions

Journals:  http://www.pbs.org/lewisandclark/archive/idx_jou.html

 

Jefferson’s Inaugural Address:

 

http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres16.html

 

Probably the “coolest” president ever---was the smartest—many different “professions”…writer… scientist…architect…philosopher…political scientist…politician…JF Kennedy was having all American Nobel laureates over to the Whitehouse for dinner…”this is greatest collection of minds ever in the Whitehouse with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”

 

Jeffersonian Restraint…held himself back from making a bunch of changes

Jefferson quickly pardoned the prisoners of the Sedition Actsa bunch of laws that made it illegal to say anything bad about the government of the US or Government Officials.  What about freedom of speech?  This law goes against that.  Federalist law (Washington and ADAMS)  They were sick of being criticized in newspapers—so ADAMS had this law passed.

The Naturalization Law of 1802 reduced the requirement of 14 years of residence to the previous 5 years.

Jefferson also changed the economic system of America

          Did away with the excise tax.                                                   

          Albert Gallatin- Secretary of Treasury to Jefferson; believed that a national debt wasn't a blessing; he reduced the national debt with a strict economy (saved money instead of spending and borrowing.

 

 

 

 

Opinion:  http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/marbury.html

 

Samuel Chase- supreme court justice of whom the Democratic-Republican Congress tried to remove in retaliation of the John Marshall's decision regarding Marbury; was not removed due to a lack of votes in the Senate.

 

 

The Louisiana Godsend? (Godsend=A Gift—something that benefits) Shi and Mayer 282

Territory is going to be a problem

·        Indians—maybe they won’t want to move

·        Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa (The Prophet)—stand in the Ohio Valley

 

Tecumseh and the Prophet

Twelfth Congress- met in 1811; the "war hawks" wanted to go to war with the British and wanted to eliminate the Indian threats to pioneers.

Tecumseh- Shawnee, along with his brother, unified many Indian tribes in a last ditch battle with the settlers; allied with the British.

 

 

 

Tenskwatawa- "the Prophet"; Shawnee, along with his brother, unified many Indian tribes in a last ditch battle with the settlers; allied with the British.

 

 

 

 

 

·        How are slaves going to fit in to this new area?

o       Do we allow slavery in these new areas or do we not?

o       This is going to end up contributing to the Civil War.  The L.P. and the land we got from the war with Mexico (Mexican Cession--1848).

Napoleon Bonaparte convinced the king of Spain to give Louisiana land area to France in 1800.

Not wanting to fight Napoleon and France in western America, Jefferson sent James Monroe to join Robert Livingston in Paris in 1803 to buy as much land as he could for $10 million. 

Napoleon decided to sell all of Louisiana and abandon his dream of a New World Empire for 2 reasons:         

He failed in his efforts to re-conquer the island of Santo Domingo, for which Louisiana was to serve as a source of foodstuffs.

Because Britain controlled the seas, Napoleon didn't want Britain to take over Louisiana.  So he wanted the money from the Americans.  He also hoped the new land for America would help to thwart the ambitions of the British king in the New World.

Robert Livingston- along with James Monroe, negotiated in Paris for the Louisiana land area; signed a treaty on April 30, 1803 ceding Louisiana to the United States for $15 million

The Americans had signed 3 treaties and gotten much land to the west of the Mississippi820,000 square miles at 3 cents/acre.

Jefferson sent his personal secretary, Meriwether Lewis, and William Clark to explore the northern part of the Louisiana Purchase.       

 

The Aaron Burr Conspiracies

Aaron Burr- Jefferson's first-term vice president; after being dropped from Jefferson's cabinet, he joined a group of extremist Federalists who plotted the secession of New England and New York; Alexander Hamilton uncovered the plot. 

Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel and Hamilton accepted.

 

Hamilton refused to shoot and he was shot and killed by Burr.

General James Wilkinson- the corrupt military governor of Louisiana Territory; made an allegiance with Burr to separate the western part of the United States from the East and expand their new confederacy with invasions of Spanish-controlled Mexico and Florida; betrayed Burr when he learned that Jefferson knew of the plot; Burr was acquitted of the charges of treason by James Madison and he fled to Europe.                                

 

America: A Nutcrackered Neutral

Jefferson was reelected in 1804, capturing 162 electoral votes, while his Federalist opponent (Charles Pinckney) only received 14 votes.

England was the power of the seas, and France had the power of land.

England issued a series of Orders in Council in 1806

They closed the European ports under French control to foreign shipping. 

The French ordered the seizure of all merchant ships that entered British ports.

 

The Hated Embargorefuse to trade with another country or countries—always hurts the embargoer more than the embargoee

 

Indian Hostilities

Indian Hostilities, Pennsylvania Gazette, Mar. 4 1812:

 

http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/2311/2367474/09_india.HTM

 

 

Madison's Gamble

James Madison became president on March 4, 1809.

 

 

 

 

Congress issued Macon's Bill No. 2.  

It reopened American trade with the entire world. 

 Napoleon convinced James Madison to give Britain 3 months to lift its Orders in Council. 

Madison did, but Britain chose not to lift its Orders in Council, and Madison had to reenact the United States's trade embargo, but this time just against Britain

Macon's Bill No. 2 led to the War of 1812.

 

 

William Henry Harrison- governor of the Indiana territory; defeated the Shawnee at the Battle of Tippecanoe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Madison's War

On June 1, 1812, Madison asked Congress to declare war on the British and it agreed.

The Democratic-Republicans who supported the war ("war hawks") felt that the country had to assert American rights to the world. 

 

 

 

 

They wanted to invade Canada, the Indians' stronghold, because the Indians were being armed by the British to attack the settlers.

The Federalists were opposed because they supported Britain.

 

 

Thomas Jefferson’s biggest thing—Louisiana Purchase.  3 Cents per acre--$15 million for the entire area.  Buying all this land was a controversial event.

 

Controversial—something that could start and argument—lots of clashing opinions.

          1.  What is all that land going to be good for?

          2.  You had permission to spent $10 million now you spend 15 million?

          3.  The bargain makes us think it might just be a desert.

          4.  How are we going to travel out there to see what we got! 

          5.  How are we suppose to govern such a big area?

          6.  When we get way out there we will run into, Indians, Spaniards, Russians,          Mexican and British folk that don’t like us.

          7.  Where does Jefferson get off doubling the size of our country?

 

Jefferson—third president—replaces a sitting president who was very different from him.  He was also very different from George Washington.  Washington and Adams were Federalists.  Jefferson always said—the people in the government can only do what the Constitution says they can do!  Limited government.

 

Jefferson buys Louisiana and there is nothing in the Constitution saying he has the power to do that.

 

We have beliefs—what happens when those beliefs conflict with what is best or right in a situation.  Jefferson was a man of contradictions—beliefs sometimes conflicted with what he did—and he bought it!

 

The Louisiana Godsend

 

Napoleon Bonaparte convinced the king of Spain to give Louisiana land area to France in 1800.

Not wanting to fight Napoleon and France in western America, Jefferson sent James Monroe to join

 

Robert Livingston in Paris in 1803 to buy as much land as he could for $10 million. 

 

Napoleon decided to sell all of Louisiana and abandon his dream of a New World Empire for 2 reasons:         

·        He failed in his efforts to re-conquer the island of Santo Domingo, for which Louisiana was to serve as a source of foodstuffs.

 

·        Because Britain controlled the seas, Napoleon didn't want Britain to take over Louisiana.  So he wanted the money from the Americans.  He also hoped the new land for America would help to thwart the ambitions of the British king in the New World.

 

Robert Livingston- along with James Monroe, negotiated in Paris for the Louisiana land area; signed a treaty on April 30, 1803 ceding Louisiana to the United States for $15 million.  The Americans had signed 3 treaties and gotten much land to the west of the Mississippi820,000 square miles at 3 cents/acre.

 

Jefferson sent his personal secretary, Meriwether Lewis, and William Clark to explore the northern part of the Louisiana Purchase.    

 

Opener: 

ID or Explain one event in each President’s term: 

 

President Chart #1

 

American Odyssey Ch. 5, Section 1 Pg. 130-140

Territorial Expansion

1.     Why did Lewis and Clark set out to explore the territory west of the Mississippi in 1804?

2.     What did Daniel Boone do to build the Wilderness Road?

3.     How many folks traveled the Wilderness Road from 1775-1790?

4.     What ended Napoleon’s hopes for an American Empire?

5.     What were three instructions given to Lewis and Clark?

6.     Give three descriptions of a Conestoga Wagon…

7.     List three threats faced by frontier farmers.

8.     What law insisted on respect for Native American land claims?

9.     What three things did Tecumseh and his brother the Prophet want Indians to do?

10. What did the Cherokees do in 1827 in order to protect their interests?

Day 20

JUSH

Mar. 1 A1 A3

Mar. 2 B4

 

Home

Texts

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

Opener:

Schweikert pg. 146 and 147…copy the three column, eight row table comparing 18th Century Republicans and Federalists…discuss the vocabulary in the chart.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Day 21

JUSH

Mar. 5 A1 A3

Mar. 6 B4

 

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

Opener:

American Odyssey Chapter 5 Section 2 (Pg. 140) work sheet

 

Last time we talked about the Louisiana Purchase

Whose land was the Louisiana Territory?

 

What problem was exacerbated by the acquisition of new lands?

          Challenge the sectional balance

Sectionalism—the idea that your section of the country is more important than the whole country.

Nationalism—the whole country is more important.

          11-11  Slave Free--1820

 

Manifest Destiny--America was destined to dominate the entire North American Continent

          Why?

 

Mid 1800's this comes to a conflict—why then?

 

1607 Jamestown, Virginia

1619  Three things

o       Slaves

o       Women

o       Representative Government (House of Burgesses)

Add 262 (1861) years and we have a Civil War over Slavery!

 

The Pursuit of Happiness=the Right to enjoy the fruit of ones labor

 

 

Missouri’s statehood request brought up the most important controversy over slavery up to that time (1820).

 

America is only 31 years old!

 

1789 GW sworn in…

 

1820 31 years old. 

 

The Union is “saved” at this time.

 

It is saved by the Missouri Compromise.

 

This question ends in secession (states think they can leave the Union) and war (Civil War 1861-1865).

Why now?

 

Why does slavery become such a heated topic 240 years after it started in 1619, Jamestown, Virginia?

 

America became a place where folks thought about the “rightness” and “wrongness” of things that had always been around.

 

America became much more “religious”

 

People thought they could “perfect” the human experience. 

 

In the early 1830’s people started experimenting with different ways to live…UTOPIA—Perfect community

 

They tried “communes” where everyone shares in the work and shares in the fruits of the work.

 

“Utopian societies” were attempted to be created. 

 

There was plenty of room in America for “weird” people to go west and live the way they wanted.

 

Outside the reach of “government.”

 

Shakers were one group who tried this…

     Property sharing

     Vegetarianism

     Sexual abstinence (their numbers would only grow through adoption and conversion)

     Believed private property was sinful

     Sex was an “animal passion of the lower orders”

     Participated in wild religious dances (Shaking) (Quaking)

     Spoke to God in “tongues”—unknown language of the Holy Spirit

They thrived in America because of the “open” space we had available here.

 

     They were so bad at farming that they did not last a year

 

What these movements did was make it acceptable to question traditional ways of doing things and living.  Especially something like SLAVERY.

    

These folks questioned everything. 

 

They rejected all social arrangements, traditions and church doctrines. 

 

Even the traditional family was questioned as an abuse of power.

 

Marriage was a form of oppression…even slavery. 

 

The idea of one person having power over another is totally unacceptable…this is going to fuel a movement that causes the Civil War---abolitionism.

 

Before they worry about blacks being free…they focus on women. 

 

As women get more and more legal, property rights…in divorce cases, child custody, which women first get in 1842. 

 

Women get economic rights…rights to work in factories…right to be educated…it was during this time that the first all female college opened Oberlin.

 

Oberlin becomes a “radically abolitionist” institution…arguing against the morality of slavery.

 

Abolitionism-the radical belief in the immediate prohibition of slavery. 

 

Abolitionists were different from people who opposed slavery. 

 

Abolitionists wanted to free all the slaves, immediately, without compensation to the owners of the slaves. 

 

Most people simply did not like slavery and did not want it to spread. 

 

Had no real answer for slaves in the south…what to do with them…who would do the work in the south…

 

Should the people who owned them be paid for their property?

 

Some thought all slaves should be freed and provided transportation back to Africa

 

After the Revolutionary war the American Colonization Society was formed for this purpose.

 

Since this had not been done…more radical abolitionists arose and were vocal…

 

William Lloyd Garrison…Jan. 1, 1831 published the Liberator which demanded immediate freedom for slaves.

 

The most prominent and effective speakers against slavery were former slaves…

 

Frederick Douglas, Sojourner Truth and Harriet Tubman went around speaking about the horrors of slavery.

 

Douglas was the son of a white slave holder and a slave woman. 

 

He escaped and headed north from Maryland and wrote MY BONDAGE AND MY FREEDOM.

 

 Mom taught him to read (against the law). 

 

His story served as an inspiration to folks who did not think blacks were human…

 

Douglas’ example proved that he was indeed a “man.”

 

Our country becomes fixated on one issue…slavery. 

 

It is an issue that can not be compromised on you can not have “a little” slavery. 

 

You can not be “a little dead”. 

 

It is something that politicians can not solve by being politicians. 

 

Only issue that we can relate to…abortion. 

 

Those issues that are unable to be solved by compromise…end up being the most emotional and divisive issues we face.

 

In the case of slavery…it leads to the Civil War. 

 

Only can be decided by war which kills 600,000 young men North and South.

 

This time 1820-1850 slave holders start to develop an attitude about slavery different from that held up to this time.

·        Up to 1820/1830 slavery is seen a  “peculiar institution”…people are not “proud” of slavery

·        In and around this time…slave holders start to “defend” slavery as something…a positive good and essential to their rights

 

Founders who owned slaves did so knowing it was probably wrong…did it anyway to make money…economic reasons.

 

When it comes to the question of the spread of slavery some folks are going to defend it as something good…that needs to be expanded.

 

 

Summary:

Slavery and the Sectional Balance

The House of Representatives slowed the plans of the Missourians of becoming a state by passing the Tallmadge Amendment

It (the Tallmadge Amendment) called for no more slaves to be brought into Missouri and called for the gradual emancipation of children born to slave parents already there. 

The amendment was later defeated by the slave states in Congress.

 

The Uneasy Missouri Compromise

Henry Clay introduced the compromise that decided whether or not Missouri would be admitted as a slave state. 

Congress decided to admit Missouri as a slave state in 1820.  

But, Maine, which was apart of Massachusetts, was to be admitted as a separate, free state

Therefore, there were 12 slave states and 12 free states.

The Missouri Compromise by Congress forbade slavery in the remaining territories in the Louisiana Territory north of the line of 36° 30', except for Missouri.

History of slavery in America—growth of sectionalism:

·        1619—First slaves come to Jamestown, Virginia

242 Years!  Slavery exists and prospers!

·        1861—Civil War begins over slavery/states rights

Sectionalism—land causes a great amount of controversy (trouble).

Slavery is a troubling thing throughout American history—in 1787 at the Constitutional Convention—one of the first things Ben Franklin proposed…get rid of slavery…Philadelphia was a strong anti-slavery city.

Southern states tell him to shut-up!

The Panic of 1819 (depression) worsened tension between the sections, and growing sectionalism repeatedly influenced the politics of the 1820s.

The most sharply divisive event was the Missouri Crisis of 1819-1820.

Many of Missouri Territory’s settlers were native southerners who owned slaves, and they petitioned for Missouri’s admission as a slave state.

But New York Congressman James Tallmadge’s amendment to the admission bill called for the gradual abolition of slavery in the proposed new state.

This was the first attempt to restrict the expansion of slavery since the Northwest Ordinance of 1787.

The Tallmadge amendment was fiercely debated—it passed in the House but lost in the Senate.

The debate generated by the Tallmadge Amendment did not deal with the morality of slavery or the rights of blacks; what was at stake was political influence.

Neither was it about he existence of slavery in the Southern states, but rather about it being further extended.

At the time there were 11 slave states and 11 free states, and Missouri’s admission would give the slave states a majority, thus frightening northerners who already complained of the advantages the South gained from the Three-Fifths Compromise and who also feared having to compete with slave labor.

Still, the free states had a 105-81 edge in House of Representatives, as the North’s population was growing more rapidly.

Ironically, the North’s more rapid growth was partially attributable to slavery, since immigrants did not want to go where they would have to compete with slave labor.

The moral issue of slavery was not yet a serious question for open debate—that would come with the advent of the abolitionist movement about a decade later (1830’s).

Nevertheless, the Missouri crisis was serious and a significant harbinger (signal) of things to come.

Henry Clay, of Kentucky, became known as the “great compromiser,” stepped in and took advantage of the fact that Maine had applied for admission as the 23rd state, making it possible to strike a balance.

The Missouri Compromise admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, and the Thomas Amendment barred slavery north of the 36x30° latitude in the old Louisiana Purchase Territory. (The line runs along the southern boundary of Missouri.)

Southerners accepted the terms since they believed the banned territory was environmentally hostile to slavery anyway, thinking it was part of the “great American desert.”

Clay also worked out a second compromise when the Missouri constitution tried to ban free blacks from migrating into the new state.

The Missouri Crisis warned of the potential divisiveness of the slavery issue.

Reaction to the Compromise was mixed: it was seen as a temporary solution at best; strong feelings about the slavery would continue to smolder.

To Thomas Jefferson, the issue sounded like a “fire bell in the night”; he had previously written, as inscribed on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial:

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever. Commerce between master and slave is despotism. Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free.”

The final compromise was accepted, but really accomplished by smoke and mirrors—it said that, in effect, “this constitution (Missouri) does not mean what it says.” But in the climate of the times, it was accepted with relief, and the country did not have to confront the slavery issue again until 1850, but by that time the abolitionist movement had thoroughly transformed the dynamics of the debate.

It would be much harder next time.

 

 

 

Day 22

JUSH

Mar. 7 A1 A3 Keytrain

Mar. 8 B4

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

OPENER:

Start Reading (Schweikert) pg. 195

The Fire Bell in the night

 

1.     Make a list of all slave states and all free states

2.     What was the Tallmadge Amendment?

3.     What did the South want in the newly acquired Louisiana Territory?

4.     What did the Constitution say about slavery in the territories?

5.     What did the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 say about it?

6.     Who came up with the Missouri Compromise and where was he from?

7.      Explain the Missouri Compromise of _______ (year)

8.     What did the South have to hold on to in order to be sure slavery would survive?

 

Skip to pg. 251 (Schweikert) and read:

An Arsenic Empire

1.       What is arsenic?

2.       What did our nation look like territorially in 1850?

3.       How did our nation compare to other great nations at this time?

4.       List four ways we dealt with the slavery question up to this time.

5.    Why did Emerson warn that the acquisition of Mexico was akin to taking arsenic?

 

 

 

Look up the following…Schweikert/Johnson (Why were they historically significant?)

(6 lines space)

Kentucky Resolution—Author/Contains

(2 lines space for each)

Virginia Resolution—Author/Contains

 

Compromise of 1820--Missouri Compromise—4 bullet points

 

Monroe Doctrine—Who…what…when…where

 

Corrupt Bargain--Election of 1824--

 

Nullification Crisis (Tariff of Abominations)

 

South Carolina Exposition—John Calhoun

 

Trail of Tears—Cherokee Removal—Andrew Jackson

Lecture Point 10:  "Good Feelings" and Jacksonian Democracy (1815-1840)

                                                JUSH March 3, 2011

 

Look up the following…(Why were they historically significant?)

 

Central Question:  What is suppose to happen when the national (Federal) government makes a law that the States or People do not think is proper or Constitutional?

 

 

Kentucky Resolution and Virginia Resolution--

 

Written by Thomas Jefferson (Declaration of Independence) and James Madison (Constitution)...Alien and Sedition Acts (laws) were "unconstitutional" against the Constitution.  Nullification--if a law is deemed to be UNCONSTITUTIONAL it can be declared by a state to be null and void.

 

Compromise of 1820--Missouri Compromise--

 

Maine admitted as a free state,  Missouri admitted as a slave state, land south of 36 30 line in Louisiana Purchase would be open to slavery, all land north of that except for Missouri would be free.  Solemn (serious and respected) decision that folks thought solved the problem for ever...problem is...what is going to happen in the west with regards to slavery?

 

Monroe Doctrine--

 

Proposed by James Monroe...wanted to establish power and influence in the Western Hemisphere by making it "Doctrine" that European interests had to keep out of America (north or South) because we said so!  We had no power to enforce this...this was announced in _______ so we were only ____ years old...European countries around for hundreds of years...would they obey?  France did not want England in America and England did not want France so it just might work if they fight each other and we end up growing stronger!

 

 

Corrupt Bargain--Election of 1824--

 

 

 

 

 

Nullification Crisis (Tariff of Abominations)--

Tariff of 1833—very high tariff that southern states do not want to pay.

Tariff—tax on imports…raises the price of imported goods.

Used to raise money and protect American Industry

 

 

 

 

South Carolina Exposition--John Calhoun--

 

 

 

 

 

Trail of Tears--Cherokee Removal--Andrew Jackson--

 

March 4

150th anniversary of Lincoln’s Inauguration 1861

Lincoln’s 1st Inaugural

 

Site:  Jefferson Letters

 

Read in Schweikert pgs. 221-228

Write down people, places, laws, religions, and things. 

From a New Nation to a Divided Nation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.        49ers

2.        Amendment

3.        Articles of Confederation

4.        Bill of Rights

5.        British Impressment

6.        Daniel Boone

7.        Eli Whitney

 

 

People (men) who moved to California looking for gold in 1849

Alteration or change to the Constitution

America’s first Federal Constitution established in 1781…states held most govt. power

10 amendments to the Constitution that made the anti-federalists accept it and guaranteed people’s freedoms

British navy forced American naval men to serve on British ships…British kidnapping of American men

Blazed trail through the Cumberland Gap and founded the National road…and Boonseboro

Invented the cotton gin…revolutionized cotton planting…gave slavery a new profitability

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 


From a New Nation to a Divided Nation

49ers

Amendment

Articles of Confederation

Bill of Rights

British Impressment

Daniel Boone

Eli Whitney

 

 

Men who went to California in that year to look for gold…start the “Gold Rush”__________________

Written change or addition to the Constitution__________________________

The first government in America adopted in 1781 _____________________

Amendments added to Constitution in 1791 to appease Anti-Federalists _____________________

British Navy kidnapping American sailors and force them to serve on British Ships__________________

Built the National Road through the Cumberland Gap ________________________

Introduced the Cotton Gin…made processing cotton much easier…more profitable__________________

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Day 23

JUSH         

Mar 9 A1 A3

Mar 12 B4  

 

Home

Texts

Worksheets    

Our Schweikert Study Guide

Top

 

 

1.  House Divided

 

 

Jefferson Questions

 

Jefferson Power Point 1

 

Discuss Missouri Compromise and Fire Bell in the Night message by Thomas Jefferson

 

The Fire Bell in the night

 

 

Extension of Slavery is
"like a fire bell in the night"

In this letter Jefferson voiced the fears of many Americans that conflicting views of states' rights, slavery, westward expansion, and the powers of the federal government had brought the United States to the verge of civil war. Despite the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state, the intransigent nature of these explosive issues proved Jefferson to be prophetic. "This momentous question, like a fire bell in the night, awakened and filled one with terror, I considered it at once as the knell of the Union. It is hushed indeed for the moment. but this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence . . . we have the wolf by the ears, and we can neither hold him nor safely let him go."

 

 

THOMAS JEFFERSON on Missouri: A "Fire bell in the Night"

I thank you, dear sir, for the copy you have been so kind as to send me of the letter to your constituents on the Missouri question. It is a perfect justification to them. I had for a long time ceased to read newspapers, or pay any attention to public affairs, confident they were in good hands, and content to be a passenger in our bark to the shore from which I am not distant. But this momentous question, like a fire bell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union. It is hushed, indeed, for the moment. But this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence. A geographical line, coinciding with a marked principle, moral and political, once conceived and held up to the angry passions of men, will never be obliterated; and every new irritation will mark it deeper and deeper. I can say, with conscious truth, that there is not a man on earth who would sacrifice more than I would to relieve us from this heavy reproach, in any practicable way.

The cession of that kind of property, for;' so it is misnamed, is a bagatelle which would not cost me a second thought, if, in that way, a general emancipation and expatriation could be effected; and gradually, and with due sacrifices, I think it might be. But as it is, we have the wolf by the ears, and we can neither hold him, nor safely let him go. Justice is in one scale, and self-preservation in the other. Of one thing I am certain, that as the passage of slaves from one state to another would not make a slave of a single human being who would not be so without it, so their diffusion over a greater surface would make them individually happier, and proportionally facilitate the accomplishment of their emancipation, by dividing the burden on a greater number of coadjutors. An abstinence too, from this act of power, would remove the jealousy excited by the undertaking of Congress to regulate the condition of the different descriptions of men composing a state. This certainly is the exclusive right of every state, which nothing in the Constitution has taken from them and given to the general government. Could Congress, for example, say that the non-freemen of Connecticut shall be freemen, or that they shall not emigrate into any other state?

I regret that I am now to die in the belief that the useless sacrifice of themselves by the generation of 1776, to acquire self-government and happiness to their country is to be thrown away by the unwise and unworthy passions of their sons, and that my only consolation is to be that I live not to weep over it. If they would but dispassionately weigh the blessings they will throw away against an abstract principle more likely to be effected by union than by scission, they would pause before they would perpetrate this act of suicide on themselves, and of treason against the hopes of the world. To yourself, as the faithful advocate of the Union, I tender the offering of my high esteem and respect.

 

 

Watch 10 things that unexpectedly changed America:  Gold Rush

 

Lecture Point:   Travel West and Old South

 

 

Discuss  westward expansion—problems connected with it…specifically how it led to the Civil War.  Can we bring all our property to the west with us—YES!!!...what about slaves?

 

What about the folks that are already there—they who have “first dibs” on the land.  Native Americans.

 

“Trail of Tears”---18,000 Cherokee men, women and children forced to march from Georgia to Oklahoma—west of the Mississippi.

 

Optional AMERICAN ODYSSEY -- Cherokee Expulsion Case Study—pg. 139

 

Sovereignty—power to make laws, enforce laws and interpret laws.  At first Natives are treated as foreign countries citizens—negotiated with as if they were foreigners.  US government makes treaties with them…deals to “respect their lands”

 

Georgia Citizens (white) – follow the sovereignty of the US government, Georgia state government.

Creek Indians—follow the sovereignty of their “CHIEF”

Cherokee Indians—follow the sovereignty of their “CHIEF”

 

Samuel Worcester—person who represents the problem—he is a missionary who goes to the Cherokee land—in Georgia--as a guest to teach them about Christianity.  If the Cherokees are sovereign in their own land than they can determine who comes to them and who can’t.

 

Once Georgia Indian land is found to be valuable—GOLD IS FOUND—now the Indians got to go…1st thing you do—take away their sovereignty.

 

Andrew Jackson—hated Indians—referred to them as savages.  Thought they had no rights that a white person needed to respect.  He was willing to and did use force to rid areas of Indians.

 

Cherokee Nation

                   Treaty party

                   National party

Quotes

 

President Andrew Jackson 1831—Indians will have to either move out or obey Georgia’s white man’s laws.

 

Georgia Governor Wilson Lumpkin 1832—States must have power over ALL inhabitants of the state, no matter what color or ethnicity they are.  Can’t have the sovereign Cherokee nation in Georgia’s boundries.

 

Massachusetts Senator Edward Everett 1830—Who ever heard of telling 10-15,000 families they must move from their homes and relocate 1200 miles west of their ancestral home.  No story like this can be found in history—until now!

 

Principal Chief John Ross—Cherokee Constitution 1827—the land in Georgia had been promised to the Cherokees “guaranteed and reserved forever—that will remain unchanged.

 

Dilemma: Natives Vs. Whites concerning westward moving settlers.  What is the relationship going to be?  The relationship is that the Natives will be moved off of land that white people want—until they are moved to land that white people will never want—these areas are now called reservations.

Cherokee become nation in Georgia

 

Settlers desire Cherokee land

 

Georgia claims Cherokee land restricts visitors

 

Worchester goes to Cherokee land anyway is arrested

 

Supreme Court rules that Cherokee lands are sovereign

 

President Jackson ignores the Court and favors the expulsion of the Cherokee

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Skip to pg. 256 and read:

Slavery Still 

1.       What is puzzling to historians about American economics in 1850, regarding slavery?

 

2.       What was the egregiously flawed logic in the slavery argument?

 

3.       How much were the slaves in the United States worth?  How did this compare to investments in railroads and manufacturing?

 

Skip to pg. 261 and read:

Defending the Indefensible

 

Skip to pg. 266 and read

California presented an opportunity…

                                                     

Pg. 268

The Pendulum Swings North

 

 

The Trail of Tears

Jackson's Democrats were committed to western expansion, but such expansion meant confrontation with the Indians who inhabited the land east of the Mississippi.

The Society for Propagating the Gospel Among Indians was founded in 1787 in order to Christianize Indians.

The five civilized tribes were the Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminoles

President Jackson wanted to move the Indians so the white men could expand. 

In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act

It moved more than 100,000 Indians living east of the Mississippi to reservations west of the Mississippi

The five "civilized" tribes were hardest hit. 

Black Hawk, who led Sauk and Fox braves from Illinois and Wisconsin, resisted the eviction.

The Seminoles in Florida retreated to the Everglades, fighting for several years until they retreated deeper into the Everglades.

 

 

"Old Hickory" Wallops Clay in 1833

A third party entered the election in the election of 1832: The Anti-Masonic party

The party opposed the Masonic Order, which was perceived by some as people of privilege and monopoly. 

Although Jackson was against monopolies, he was a Mason himself; therefore the Anti-Masons were an anti-Jackson party

It gained support from evangelical Protestant groups.

The Jacksonians were opposed to all government meddling in social and economic life.

Andrew Jackson was reelected in the election of 1832.

 

The Election of 1836

Martin Van Buren was Andrew Jackson's choice as his successor in the election of 1836. 

General William Henry Harrison was one of the Whig's many presidential nominees. 

The Whigs did not win because they did not united behind just one candidate.

 

Depression Doldrums and the Independent Treasury

The basic cause of the panic of 1837 was the rampant speculation prompted by a get-rich scheme. 

Gamblers in western lands were doing a "land-office business" on borrowed capital. 

The speculative craze spread to canals, roads, railroads, and slaves.  Jacksonian finance also helped to cause the panic. 

In 1836, the failure of two British banks caused the British investors to call in foreign loans. 

These loans were the beginnings of the panic.

The panic of 1837 caused many banks to collapse, commodity prices to drop, sales of public to fall, and the loss of jobs.

Van Buren proposed the Divorce Bill. 

Not passed by Congress, it called for the dividing of the government and banking altogether. 

The Independent Treasury Bill was passed in 1840

An independent treasury would be established and government funds would be locked in vaults. 

 

Gone to Texas

Mexico won its independence from Spain in 1823

Mexico gave a huge chunk of land to Stephen Austin who would bring families into Texas.

The Texans had many differences with the Mexicans. 

Mexicans were against slavery, while the Texans supported it. 

Santa Anna- president of Mexico who, in 1835, wiped out all local rights and started to raise army to suppress the upstart Texans.

 

The Lone Star Rebellion

Texas declared its independence in 1836

Sam Houston- commander in chief for Texas.

General Houston forced Santa Anna to sign a treaty in 1836 after Houston had captured Santa Anna in the Battle of San Jacinto.

The Texans wanted to become a state in the United States but the northerners did not want them to because of the issue of slavery. 

Admitting Texas would mean one more slave state.

 

Log Cabins and Hard Cider of 1840

William Henry Harrison defeated Van Buren to win the election of 1840 for the Whigs. 

The Whig's campaign included pictures of log cabins and cider.

 

Politics for the People

There were 2 major changes in politics after the Era of Good Feelings: 

          Politicians who were too clean, too well dressed, too grammatical, and too intellectual were not liked. Aristocracy was not liked by the American people. 

          The common man was moving to the center of the national political stage.

 

The Two-Party System

          There was a formation of a two-party system

          The two parties consisted of the Democrats and the Whigs (the National Republican Party had died out). 

          Jacksonian Democrats glorified the liberty of the individual. 

They supported states' rights and federal restraint in social and economic affairs. 

The Whigs supported the natural harmony of society and the value of community. 

They favored a renewed national bank, protective tariffs, internal improvements, public schools, and moral reforms, such as the prohibition of liquor and the abolition of slavery.

 

End 3rd Nine weeks